 |
Antwar Saloon Get me a beer, dammit.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: James Cameron's Avatar |
|
|
Looking at it from the outside not knowing the retarded buget or the in your face political message. Looking at the movie from 'hey whats this' kind of view of the previews I've seen on TV it looks like blue cartoon elfs fighting humans in a jungle. Looks like a renter at best. Now knowing all the other baggage it has, Looks like he's going to loose a chunk of that Titanic money. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patch

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 328 Location: Burleson TX
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
James Cameron doing the space marine thing again. How can it suck?
Ok the cartoony cgi mixed with live action is a little dicey and no Bill "Game over man" Paxton but I'll see it in the theater and hope for the best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as plot holes just from previes some comments nailed it
http://www.aintitcool.com/talkback_display/42818
some of my favorites
two super powers want to force relocate an indiginous race to expolit a valuable natural resource?
and the leader falls for one of the natives?
I saw this one when it was called Star Trek: Insurrection.
Let's hope the jokes are better this time
No reason to fight the big Smurfs hand to hand...stand off and Gas them from orbit...collect valuable rocks...end of story.
There better be a good reason to spend all that time and money risking physical contact with these things when you could just nuke/gas/beam/irradiate the cockroaches to get rid of them....or is becomes just a silly way to move the film forward.
I want to know about the story...CGI is no longer reason enough to pull the money from my wallet.
Your points:
1. the story DOESN'T matter
2. the VISUALS are great
3. therefore the STORY will be great because it's James Cameron, even though we've just been told the story and it's stupid
ok, shitty CGI, check. redundant played-out story, check. lame font for main title that looks like it was created in Quark in 1992, check. oh, and can we get that Enya Greatest Hits CD worked into the trailer as well? CHECK.
---------------------
Sorry when I heard the over the top 'message' about this my eyes rolled and a bitter taste got in my mouth. a good ol space adventure with Marines sure. Making people to be the bad guy to shove a message down our throats no frickin thanks. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haft

Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 621 Location: Amarillo
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I would say that the CG looks anything but shitty. But I do agree with the whole bit of gassing the little buggers from orbit.
Movie could be good _________________ I go down to the sea again.
To the lonely sea and sky.
And all I ask is a tall mech,
And a star to steer her by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alpern Site Admin
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1354
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Haft wrote: | Well I would say that the CG looks anything but shitty. But I do agree with the whole bit of gassing the little buggers from orbit.
Movie could be good |
I read a little book once about soldiers fighting on an alien planet. They had a massive technological advantage over the natives of the planet, but still somehow they always fought via infantry with hand weapons, even though they were so hugely outnumbered that they suffered massive losses. A major criticism of that book was why they sent troops down in the first place? Why no orbital gassing/bombing/etc?
That book was called Armor. Maybe you've heard of it. _________________ "The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." - John Brunner |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ironic, though that was sadly one of my 'dislikes' of armor I've brought up in the past, I remember penciling that in tiny when I am reading a book where it fit. But then somewhere it was brought up that the war was the means to an end for fleet. While this one is about mining. Had it been just to make war then yes.
Smurf Elves is another term floating around now. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AUSKAR

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1780 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like Armor.
I will dislike Avatar because the political message even comes through in the previews (Indians vs. Cavalry or Oil-rich Arabs vs. Greedy American Oil Companies or...) but I will see it because I expect the battle sequences will be very good.
I would like to see a well-made Armor but I don't think it is possible. It seems that almost everyone who thinks it is great does so because of a different reason. Whoever makes it might not think the same things are important that I do.
That would be a great thread - "What do you like BEST in Armor?" _________________ Visit my web site at LloydDistrict.com. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exactly. A good shoot em up aliens humans would be great and darn good movie. But nooooo its gotta get political humans bad aliens good. A little imagination and he could have reversed it and I'd be line to see it. Hell make the humans the sympathetic ones and get the same message across. Sorry I am always going to root for the home team, us being them and all.
I may rent it for the same reasons Auskar is seeing it. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johnnycat
Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1143 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll see it because it is a Cameron film. _________________ The Force is like duct tape. There's a Dark Side and a Light Side, and it holds the universe together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluewolf

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1638 Location: Afghanistan AKA The Stink
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
i wanna see it because its supposed to herald a new age of 3D.... sadly i will only get to see pirate copies so I wont get the 3D effect.... I dont think i have seen a real 3D movie in 3D since Jaws. _________________ Never surrender freedom for laws that can't affect
criminals; they disobey laws for a living.
--Wayne LaPierre, CNN commentary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cavemanjed
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 442 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I won't pay full pop for it. I'll probably check it out. But yeah, the political message is rampant, and stupid from what I can tell at the moment.
Cavemanjed _________________ Life will kill ya...but not as fast as Obamacare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AUSKAR

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1780 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xiahou wrote: | | A good shoot em up aliens humans would be great and darn good movie. |
He sort of made the movie above. It was called "Aliens."
I still don't like the political message, so I agree with XiaHou but I do sort of like it when the Aliens are the bad guys, not the good guys with humans being the bad guys. _________________ Visit my web site at LloydDistrict.com. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patch

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 328 Location: Burleson TX
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saw it today and it was fantastic. The special effects look great. The setting for the story was very cool. The story was a little predictable but fun to follow and it was just amazing to watch.
The political message and fact that humans are the bad guys, that some have complained about, is not in your face. In fact it was more like a history lesson than a message. We did wipe out the indians to take their land, so it's not far fetched to believe we would again.
I liked it and will be seeing it again in 3D. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cavemanjed
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 442 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly a good movie, but yes, the anti-capitalism and white man took our lands/oil/fruit etc message beats you over the head mercilessly. Don't pay full pop for it, its decent because Cameron does sci-fi well NOT because its story blows your mind.
On an Ironic side note right after I saw the movie, I saw a burger king(or mcdonalds, one of the two) tie-in pimping the very capitalistic excess the movie rails against. I wonder if the dipshit PR people at that company bothered to read the script before they branded their crap with "Avatar" . More so, I think that tie -in ilustrates in the end the only value that matters to Hollywood is how fast can you stack the Greenbacks.
Cavemanjed _________________ Life will kill ya...but not as fast as Obamacare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wes Janson
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I deeply, deeply wish that Cameron had given the film some actual depth to the plot. Give the Colonel and the administrator some motivation, some actual character. Steakley created a nicely nuanced villain in Borglyn, but to see such a thing in Hollywood today is virtually unheard of. A friend of mine who's absolutely crazy about Avatar even admitted that there should have been some sort of actual justification for mining unobtanium...a humanitarian pretext for saving people back on Earth, or something that made it vital to society. Instead it's a throwaway McGuffin, and no one in the room bothers to explore or even suggest other possibilities besides killing aliens.
On a purely technical plot point, if a corporation is wealthy and powerful enough that it can send hundreds of well-paid soldiers, squadrons of combat aircraft, and several companies of ground troops across lightyears of space, along with millions of tons of construction equipment, it stands to reason their investment is going to be insanely huge.
Given that, one would think there would be a bit more Command and Control being exerted than simply giving a random corporate suit control over what's obviously the most expensive commercial undertaking in history. Corporations frequently do stupid things, but stupidity on that level is almost inherently impossible due to the intrinsic systems of checks and balances built into a company of that size. If it were simply a conflict of interests, the plot would have been far more understandable. Instead it's a conflict due only to pure ignorance and stupidity on the part of the man in charge of the colony. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haft

Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 621 Location: Amarillo
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, this movie is beautiful. Saw it in digital 3d and damn, gorgeous. The plot was really throw away. I thought the main character was much more interesting in his avatar form. The CG was breathtaking. _________________ I go down to the sea again.
To the lonely sea and sky.
And all I ask is a tall mech,
And a star to steer her by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Me and Hux saw it a couple weeks ago.
I feel pretty much the same way a most do - great visuals, soft script.
For some reason, it seems that people who make movies these days can only manage to devote a lot of their focus to one aspect of the process. It doesn't seem to be a huge stretch to develop a thoughtful script, but even for some really good moviemakers, it just doesn't seem to be that important.
That's why my vote for best movie I saw last year goes to Inglorious Bastards instead of the Star Trek reboot. Bastards had it all in my mind, Star Trek got the cast dead on, the effects were good, with a plot that was distracting because it didn't track well. District 9 was similar in that the plot holes distracted from the point that was trying to be conveyed, and that's a shame, especially with what's going on in Africa.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alpern Site Admin
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1354
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jeffg wrote: | District 9 was similar in that the plot holes distracted from the point that was trying to be conveyed, and that's a shame, especially with what's going on in Africa.
Jeff |
What's going on in Africa? _________________ "The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." - John Brunner |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's like Demolition Man,
Murder, Death, Kill
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alpern Site Admin
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1354
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, but what I meant was, what does that have to do with District 9? _________________ "The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." - John Brunner |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I know what you meant. I just didn't want to get into a drawn out post for a short comment.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AUSKAR

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1780 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I finally saw this movie.
It was pretty, probably the future of film-making.
Except for the blue people, all the heroes (even the dead ones) were traitors (espcially the helicopter pilot), and that fact was a celebrated part of the movie.
Yuck. _________________ Visit my web site at LloydDistrict.com. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lance

Joined: 09 May 2008 Posts: 304 Location: Frisco, Tx (north Dallas)
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AUSKAR wrote: | I finally saw this movie.
It was pretty, probably the future of film-making.
Except for the blue people, all the heroes (even the dead ones) were traitors (espcially the helicopter pilot), and that fact was a celebrated part of the movie.
Yuck. |
Heh. That's how I felt about "A Few Good Men". So it's a Marine movie where all the Marines turn out to be criminals and the hero is a lawyer.
Anyway, with Avatar, the blue dudes were portrayed as superior. The annoying part of it is that they weren't enlightened in any way. They had a an actual interface into the world and nature. So they didn't really craft any moral code of their own, it was dictated to them directly. It's a bit like the faith argument. God speaks to someone and they tell everyone else to have faith. Well, that's real easy for the one person who doesn't need faith because he has actually witnessed. Sorry, if I land on another planet and someone claims to talk to the trees, I'll give them the address of their nearest California congressman.
Screw it, the plot was awful. It had some decent action and it looked beautiful. It was still worth paying for in IMAX. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deckard
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 320
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just saw Avatar. Yeah, yeah, I know, I am way behind the times. The reasons are twofold. First, I’m in college taking eighteen hours and I barely have time to sleep. Secondly, too many people whose opinion I trust told me that it is visually stunning but it is so weighed down by a liberal agenda that it is insulting. At least, to someone not steeped in liberal thought, which I am not. But I broke down cuz James Cameron made two of the films in my top ten all-timers list: Aliens and Terminator.
If Michelangelo had ever dabbled in using manure as a medium instead of marble I would have the perfectly succinct analogy I am currently at a loss for. Once I pulled out of the stunned stupor the visuals in this film (I saw it in 3D to boot)put me into, or about two hours in, I began to laugh at this thing. The credits said Written By James Cameron. Should there have been a Jr. on the end of that. Surely, Mr. Cameron has an eight-year-old boy who had just learned about how the West was won in school and came home saying, “Daddy, Daddy, I want to write a movie script. I have just the idea.”
Why is it just Americans on this planet anyway? This should’ve been an international force or some kind of StarFleet analog. Why aren’t the future Chinese (or whoever will be the next super power) vying for this incalculably valuable place. I would’ve been more entertained by humanity going at it with these Na’Vi folks stuck in the middle. And then there is the superficial alterity. The trees were trees, just big ones, the Na’vi were tall and blue but still people, and there were horse thingies and hyena do dads. The air is toxic but we aren’t told how. Fire burns just like on Earth, so it’s not a lack of oxygen. James, baby, throw me a bone.
Enough already, I need to stop. This is too easy. The only characters who weren’t essentially cartoons were the ones who were actually cartoons. Every human that wasn’t in the heroes clique were outrageous caricatures devoid of reason. At least have the Colonel say something like, “Look, this is just the way things are, kids, we don’t like it, but we have a job to do. Welcome to real life. It’s a shit sandwich, eat it or starve”. Something, anything to let us know that there is a brain in there, or in the corporate execs head that says, “There’s the way I’d like it to be, and then there’s the way it is,” so I can at least understand why they are all just so utterly irrational. Some people are, but not this many folks. Sorry. Or, come up with an excellent reason why they are so irrational apart from corporate greed. Corporate greed and greed in general can explain a lot. What wasn’t clear is how the enlightenment of this age had been so completely, hopelessly lost. That needed to be explained.
The real solution here was to make this not about the oil/gold/pick-your-precious- substance called unobtainium, which got a real chuckle out of me. Make it about a potent drug that only grows on Pandora, and it comes from the ‘sacred’ trees or something. The need for the super coke that gets you high and elevates or expands mental power would explain the need for the stuff on the individual soldier’s level in a way that simple greed does not. Ooops, that would make this Dune. Ha! Science Fiction. I dare anyone to write something that hasn’t been done…many, many times. _________________ "I've done . . . questionable things. Nothing the God of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for." -Roy Batty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluewolf

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1638 Location: Afghanistan AKA The Stink
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If Michelangelo had ever dabbled in using manure as a medium instead of marble I would have the perfectly succinct analogy I am currently at a loss for. |
I am oging to have to remember that quote and spend much time fitting it into conversations ^_^
I am coming stateside in 2 weeks and i plan to catch it simply because I want to see it in 3d (if I can find a theater still showing it in 3D) having said that I think i pretty much have the gist of it and will not be disapointed by plot because my expectations are already low. I will watch it purely for entertainment value and to say I saw it.
I just wish that oppinions like ours... you know... for simple and unobtrusive ways of making storylines reasonable without even changeing the story... could be made heard in hollywood....
I also wish Joss Whedon had executive veto and edit rights on every script from every big movie house in hollywood. _________________ Never surrender freedom for laws that can't affect
criminals; they disobey laws for a living.
--Wayne LaPierre, CNN commentary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also like your "Look, this is just the way things are, kids, we don’t like it, but we have a job to do. Welcome to real life. It’s a shit sandwich, eat it or starve” quote _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cavemanjed
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 442 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Much better ending than the actual movie.
Cavemanjed _________________ Life will kill ya...but not as fast as Obamacare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haft

Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 621 Location: Amarillo
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I fully agree. _________________ I go down to the sea again.
To the lonely sea and sky.
And all I ask is a tall mech,
And a star to steer her by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluewolf

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1638 Location: Afghanistan AKA The Stink
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fianlly saw this during the convention in texas and finaly getting a chance to comment since the military blocked the forums.
we can all agree that the movie is visually stunning and pretty much the standard to achieve from here on out in terms of technical application of 3d.
the story itself... I liked it. sure it was an over simplified black and white rant on evil and greed.... but it was a fun to watch simplified black and white rant on evil and greed.
Yes the "heroes" were technically traitors. but we see the same thing in Dances with Wolves, Last of the Mohicans and any story involving the American revolution.
I never saw the main guy as wantonly selfishly traitorous. He seemed very conflicted about the whole thing from jump and was almost forced into traitorous action.
honestly digging into the story at all reveals a bunch of simple minded plot holes to force the story, why didnt the corporation consider digging elsewhere, why couldn't the humans be a little less flat out evil, why couldnt the aliens be a little less flat out good, etc etc etc.
but you know what... honest truth this exact story and worse played out in the story of Cortez conquering the Aztecs (or Mayans or whoever) which is to say that its truely not an impossible story. just simple minded.
I argued the points with a friend and the bottom line for me came to this. Yes your forced to side with traitors and yes it seems to be a story all about the evils of our own society. but truth be told I never once took any of it personal. They could have been elves vs goblins, ET vs Predator, or any other non-me vs non-me. I never once took it personally except to reflect on and understand where my debate partner was coming from.
I think that its imossible to enjoy the movie if you think of the humans as us. or even America. they are characters on one side of a story about two opposing civilizations simple minded, black and white characters ment to push the rant against evil and greed.
/shrug/ so what. unless now you want to defend evil and greed as long as the evil and greed comes from YOUR side.
 _________________ Never surrender freedom for laws that can't affect
criminals; they disobey laws for a living.
--Wayne LaPierre, CNN commentary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | military blocked the forums.
|  _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluewolf

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1638 Location: Afghanistan AKA The Stink
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
military blocks things using blanket searches for words in the metadata of the page.
words like "sex" and porn "Porn" are blocked allong with words like "games" "entertainment" and "Forums"
it does not get everything and if it did not get our site it would not be a big deal. but i dont have a valid argument for exempting the site so even though its an unintentional block... it stays blocked.
PS. It occored to me today that many people have the impression that the main character was a traitor to his country or something... but its clear that they are all Mercenaries. sure he killed humans ... but does this at all change the view in some peoples minds? the fact that he was opposed to a corporation and psudo-military and not really his people or country. _________________ Never surrender freedom for laws that can't affect
criminals; they disobey laws for a living.
--Wayne LaPierre, CNN commentary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irina
Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I already posted this year, but I don't remember... So, I get to answer Blue (and tack on my own feelings about the movie, of course).
"Traitor" doesn't necessarily mean someone who betrays his country's military. There are many things that can be betrayed -- friends, accomplices, principles, concepts, ideals, etc. etc.
Let's see. Avatar gives us a main character with a handicap with the only background that he was a soldier and had an identical twin brother who became a successful scientist.
Through pure luck, our main character is placed in the situation that's the focus of the movie.
He betrays the people who've brought him into this situation for the promise of getting rid of his handicap.
The situation, by pure luck, turns out relieve his handicap. (The main character would soon grow to prefer this temporary relief from his handicap over "real life.")
As a direct effect of his own stupidity, the main character gets yet another lucky break and the situation changes in his favor.
He approaches the new and improved situation completely irresponsibly, forgets himself, and makes a mess of it for egotistical reasons.
He has a "oops" moment when he realizes that by betraying the people who've brought him into this situation he's put his relief from his handicap in jeopardy (and there's the whole thing about chasing tail, of course, which is part of the mess he's made).
So, he turns around and betrays his former friends, because that's what any outstanding intelligent being does, right?
Through luck, the mess is resolved in his favor.
And, through luck, there turns out to be a way that the relief from his handicap can be made permanent.
The End.
Granted, there's the ambiguous moment when the main character puts aside the chance to have his handicap fixed by his former friends, in order to salvage some of the mess he's made. His motivations are left to interpretation, but, considering everything else in the movie, I'd say it was pride and chasing tail. And maybe some more egotism -- there was a pretty good indication that life "back home" was crappy even with working legs, so why leave the idyllic life on Pandora behind?
So... I'm asked to cheer along a stupid, egotistical guy without scruples while he GETS LUCKY throughout the movie? Hmmm... No, thanks.
Furthermore, mercs or not mercs (human or not) -- those were people. Veterans, according to the main character. How many of them took the job because they have a family to feed and that world's military obviously doesn't take care of its own? How many of them are helping out handicapped buddies back home who weren't fortunate enough to have identical twin brothers in high-tech projects heavily dependent on DNA that were killed in muggings? How many of them are only guilty of not being as lucky as the main character?
No, wait, they are all cardboard cutouts. They're okay to kill since they're obviously only there as stand-ins for the evil imperialistic machine of greed and destruction. You go, you pure, ultimately kind beings who've never had to deal with shortage of supply, illness, natural disaster, or any other hardship, yet are respectably warrior-like, even if there's been no conflict amongst you, except, of course, in legends, because we all know wars in legends, unlike in real life, are good, and poetic, and so honorable!!
But back to the betrayal part. No, the main character didn't betray his military. He only betrayed anyone who happened to trust him (at least once) and, if you want to read deeper into it, he betrayed his heritage (by taking the easy way out of his predicament and ultimately leaving it at: "screw Earth, let the vile place die a slow death even, as long as I gots my two legs, my princess (and all the neat things that come with her), and my luck").
So, to sum up, it was a movie about a flunky who gets lucky despite being egotistical, disloyal, and irresponsible. (with some childish dissertation on good and evil tacked on for "depth" value)
But, boy, was it pretty. So pretty that I didn't regret seeing it even the second time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lance

Joined: 09 May 2008 Posts: 304 Location: Frisco, Tx (north Dallas)
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Let me be the first to claim, "I did it." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluewolf

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1638 Location: Afghanistan AKA The Stink
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Furthermore, mercs or not mercs (human or not) -- those were people. Veterans, according to the main character. How many of them took the job because they have a family to feed and that world's military obviously doesn't take care of its own? How many of them are helping out handicapped buddies back home who weren't fortunate enough to have identical twin brothers in high-tech projects heavily dependent on DNA that were killed in muggings? How many of them are only guilty of not being as lucky as the main character? |
Irrelevant, I am sure that a large number of the Taliban enemy delt with here in Afghanistan are doing it simply and for no other reason than its the only steady paycheck to pay for the 12 mouths they have to feed at home. doesn't mean jack to me when he is burring mines, shooting rockets or setting ambushes. personal sob stories do not make an active combatant any less of a valid kill.
| Quote: | | But back to the betrayal part. No, the main character didn't betray his military. He only betrayed anyone who happened to trust him (at least once) and, if you want to read deeper into it, he betrayed his heritage (by taking the easy way out of his predicament and ultimately leaving it at: "screw Earth, let the vile place die a slow death... |
Other than the place sucking there is absolutely no indication that this mission has anything at all to do with the survival of earth. There is no great war or sickness or environmental disaster alluded to at any point in the story. Overcrowding and corruption maybe but if that's the case send out colony ships not strip miners.
He was lucky... so what... ultimately every hero of every story relies on a bit of luck to get him through the day. Selfish? Ill give you that... then again we are all motivated ultimately by selfish reasons... some are simply more honorable selfish reasons than others.
ultimately it comes to this... if you watched a movie about an alien/angel/daemon/Orc/english or other form of bad guy that turns on its own to save us would you consider it a good story? If so that's probably because you personalize the story and characters. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. but I dont, they are just characters. I didnt have any personal value in the humans or the navi simply because they are human or navi. my only complaint with that part of the movie is that the humans were so clearly the bad guys and the navi so clearly the good but that too has nothing to do with human vs navi... i simply hate black and white hero/villain scenarios. _________________ Never surrender freedom for laws that can't affect
criminals; they disobey laws for a living.
--Wayne LaPierre, CNN commentary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irina
Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
En garde, mon ami! =D
| bluewolf wrote: |
| Quote: | | Furthermore, mercs or not mercs (human or not) -- those were people. |
Irrelevant, I am sure that a large number of the Taliban enemy delt with here in Afghanistan are doing it simply and for no other reason than its the only steady paycheck to pay for the 12 mouths they have to feed at home. doesn't mean jack to me when he is burring mines, shooting rockets or setting ambushes. personal sob stories do not make an active combatant any less of a valid kill. |
Yes, that's irrelevant in real life. In most cases in non-life threatening situations, and in all cases in life-threatening situation.
In movies, or any other type of storytelling media... Not necessarily. In my spill I tried to focus only on Jake Sully's character. The only reason I went into the aside about the humans being cardboard cutouts is in light of how their presentation in this piece of fiction reflects on the main character. What I saw in this movie was a dislikable guy fighting shadow puppets of some shorthanded Great Evil to the (dubious and generally unintended) benefit of fashionably PC'ed "innocents." Had the guy been likable, I probably would have ignored the fact the bad guys were shadow puppets. Had the guy been dislikable but smart, I would have loved to hate him. Had there been depth to the "good guys," I might have rejoiced at the end. Had there been depth to the "bad guys," I might have seen this as a "challenge your thinking" type of story.
As it stands right now... Well, it WAS pretty.
| bluewolf wrote: |
Other than the place sucking there is absolutely no indication that this mission has anything at all to do with the survival of earth. There is no great war or sickness or environmental disaster alluded to at any point in the story. Overcrowding and corruption maybe but if that's the case send out colony ships not strip miners. |
Note I said "read deeper" by which I mean that I extrapolated. There's no indication that this "unobtainium" material benefited Earth in any way, but there were multiple indications that Earth is a baaaaad place (war, poor health care, environmental trouble, without any extrapolation). Jake washed his hands of all that. I'm not saying it's every human being's duty to improve the world they live in and be responsible for their own actions (well, ok, I might have occasionally said it, but that's irrelevant for this conversation). What's relevant is that we're talking about the protagonist of this grand masterpiece that supposedly carries a deep message about protecting our environment and overcoming human weakness. Well, Jake Sully's a poor choice of a protagonist, I say.
| bluewolf wrote: |
He was lucky... so what... ultimately every hero of every story relies on a bit of luck to get him through the day. Selfish? Ill give you that... then again we are all motivated ultimately by selfish reasons... some are simply more honorable selfish reasons than others. |
A "bit of luck" vs. "only luck"... Don't you see the difference?
People being ultimately selfish... Well, absolutely. But the selfish guy who basks in the praise for a job well done will get a little more respect from me than the guy who: 1. destroys equipment, endangers people's wellbeing, and breaks rules just because he's so oh, very excited to be able to feel his legs again!!!!; 2. leaves the people he's supposed to protect in a dangerous environment because he's bored and disregards basic common sense and most likely expedition regulations to PLAY with the flora (or possibly fauna) of a not-well understood (and very dangerous) world because the funky shaped plant-things are so amusing when you slap them and they retract with this funky little sound they make (and he's a war veteran?! Makes me wonder exactly how he got wounded); 3. ... (should I go on? -- yeah, if you're wondering, I already hated the guy before we even saw the Na'vi; doesn't really help with story immersion).
| bluewolf wrote: |
ultimately it comes to this... if you watched a movie about an alien/angel/daemon/Orc/english or other form of bad guy that turns on its own to save us would you consider it a good story? |
Generally, no. Especially if its motivations aren't ones I can respect.
| bluewolf wrote: |
my only complaint with that part of the movie is that the humans were so clearly the bad guys and the navi so clearly the good but that too has nothing to do with human vs navi... i simply hate black and white hero/villain scenarios. |
And here we agree. That's one pet-peeve I have too, but I've liked plenty of movies/stories that have the problem of being black and white. But they've had something else that's worked for me. In Avatar, other than the visual experience, there was really nothing that appealed to me. (Well, that, and I don't really like getting smacked over the head with messages, especially when they're so shorthanded). And, yeah, I like looking at pretty things. But I guess I want a little more from stories. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Irina,
I don't know if you're past your max post count for the year, but you've definitely outdone yourself on word count. I had to go back and see that these posts were actually yours.
BTW, I'm wondering what you thought of District 9, if you saw it. If the key word was "lucky" for the hero in Avatar, the words "self preservation" come to mind for the hero in that movie. I didn't find him heroic at all.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irina
Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff -- rambling is one of the few skills I can safely say I've perfected. Now I'm working on actually making sense while I ramble. =)
As far as District 9, hasn't District 9 hunting season been over for a few months now? I guess I'd rather not restart it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | In Avatar, other than the visual experience, there was really nothing that appealed to me. (Well, that, and I don't really like getting smacked over the head with messages, especially when they're so shorthanded). And, yeah, I like looking at pretty things. But I guess I want a little more from stories. | which brings me full circle. Blue we've had this discussion about comic movies and such as well Irina spells it out nicely. Sure it made TONS of money but imagine the money without the heavy handed story I know I would have went, eye candy isn't enough for me to pay theater prices. Netflix queue maybe, free instant download sure. Give us a story and the visuals people would rave nonstop about it instead of fans of it even making a disclaimer for the story. You'd swear its like D&D point and they are given the choice of how much to put into story and visuals and he is taking a penalty on the story for boosting visuals. People who went to it and liked it for the visuals would have went if the story was better and those that didn't like the story and didn't go back or didn't bother to go to begin with would go and go again. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Irina wrote: | Jeff -- rambling is one of the few skills I can safely say I've perfected. Now I'm working on actually making sense while I ramble. =)
As far as District 9, hasn't District 9 hunting season been over for a few months now? I guess I'd rather not restart it. |
Well, yeah, if you'd ever started it, or been a part of it! I looked to see if you posted on that thread, but I should've known you didn't because you would have abstained from posting for about two years.
I was just curious what you thought - but it's not gonna change what I thought, so you're right - no need to pursue this.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irina
Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jeffg wrote: |
I was just curious what you thought - but it's not gonna change what I thought, so you're right - no need to pursue this.
|
When it comes to entertainment or art, I never offer my opinions in order to change anyone else's. But I do justify them in detail (see above) -- and I probably have a bit too much fun doing so.
Alright, my opinion about District 9 -- it was another movie in which I didn't find much appeal (which is usually a deal breaker for me) and I thought the premise/setting was too contrived to be immersive (for me). I couldn't respect the main character for his motives (about which I think you're right), but he also wasn't built-up as the "hero," so I didn't have that much problem accepting his character for what he was. I did love the gritty feel of the movie, and the special effects were very nicely done.
I hope this is short enough. =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffg
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 1191 Location: Saint Augustine, Florida
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, ditto and all that.
Glad I got that out of your system. You can go back to short posting - maybe in 2012.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xiahou

Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 2398 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA&feature=related
I posted about these guys first 2 star wars prequel reviews they also did one in the same format for Avatar. Brilliant and hilarious at the same time. _________________ Where are you John Wayne when we need you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|